Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:25

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Norris storms to pole in Austria as Verstappen takes seventh - F1
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Healthy Returns: Ozempic, Wegovy linked to rare cases of serious eye condition - CNBC
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
‘I think Xbox hardware is dead’, says Microsoft gaming veteran - Video Games Chronicle
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Browns' quarterback competition is right where it's supposed to be | The Huddle - Cleveland Browns
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Best Deals Today: Steam Summer Sale, Twin Peaks, Super Mario Odyssey, and More - IGN
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why is Joe Biden so vocal about supporting Ukraine's defense against Russia?
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How to watch the 2025 Tony Awards on Sunday - NPR
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?